Grazie. It seems to simply be a chronological difference--the New Years celebration was only recognized on this day for a shorter period than the other it seems. January 1st, I believe it was? We seemed to have changed it for the religion only to have it changed back later when the calendars were set more solidly.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 06:30 am (UTC)Grazie. It seems to simply be a chronological difference--the New Years celebration was only recognized on this day for a shorter period than the other it seems. January 1st, I believe it was? We seemed to have changed it for the religion only to have it changed back later when the calendars were set more solidly.
From what I gather.